Research Article

GNSS Sky Visibility Planning and Dilution of Precision Analysis for EOS Ground Station Selection for Nigeria Space Programme

M. L. Ojigi1*, J. D. Dodo2, Y. D. Opaluwa3
1 Mission Planning, IT and Data Management Department, National Space Research and Development Agency (NASRDA), Abuja, Nigeria
2 Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria
3 Centre for Geodesy and Geodynamics, NASRDA, Toro, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: lazarus.ojigi@nasrda.gov.ng
Published: Oct, 2014
DOI: 10.54222/jgst.2014.ka46hcst
Pages: 70-93
Views: 18
Downloads: 1

Abstract

The establishment of Earth Observation Satellite (EOS) ground receiving stations in parts of Nigeria and other parts of the globe, similar to the Indian Remote Sensing (IRS) model will enhance global telecommand, precise EOS tracking, data transmission, and distribution of NigeriaSat data, which will enhance global-scale data awareness, usage and higher financial returns for Nigeria. This study, therefore, attempts the application of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) sky visibility planning and dilution of precision analysis technique to select the optimal location for EOS ground station(s) in Nigeria. The Nigerian Geodetic Network (NigNet) GNSS Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) RINEX data of February 2012 and Trimble Total Control (TTC) software were used for the determinations of the baselines and positions of the 11 available CORS. The technique of GNSS sky visibility planning and dilution of precision (DOP) was adopted because signals from satellites behave in a similar pattern in the atmosphere, so poor visibility in GNSS signals in a particular observation window translates relatively to poor orbit definition signal for an EOS. Based on Jon's rating of DOP values [1= ideal; 2-3 = excellent; 4-6 =good; 7-8= moderate; 9-20=fair; 21-50= poor)], the DOP values for the stations across Nigeria can be adjudged to range between excellent and good for ground receiving stations. However, the overall results showed that GEMB on ellipsoidal heights of 1795.7857m has the most suitable DOPs and sky visibility plan for ground receiving sites followed by CGG Toro (916.7853m) and RAMPOLY Maiduguri (702m). The sky visibility analysis showed the availability of an average of 9 GPS and 2 GLONASS constellation satellites to receivers at elevation angles of 10°-15° between 6:00hrs and 24:00hrs daily across Nigeria. The approach of OS ground receiving station suitability analysts demonstrated in this study is recommended for the Nigerian.

Keywords

GNSS Sky Visibility Planning DOP EOS Ground Station

References

  1. Dow, J.M., Martin Mur, T.J., Romay Merino, M.M., (1994).ESA's Precise Orbit Determination Facility, ESA Bulletin No. 78, May.
  2. Chizea, F. D. and J. I. Ejimanya, J. I., (undated). NigeriaSat-2: Technical Parameters, Operational Perspectives and Target Applications. http://www.nasrda.net/Earth_Future/NigeriaSat_2_Paper3.doc
  3. Cox, J., Chao, C. C., Stephens P. W., and Warner, L. F., (2000).Optical Tracker and S-Band Ranging Utility for Accurate Orbit Determination and Prediction. Proceedings, AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Paper AAS 00-116 (January 23–26).
  4. ESA, (2008). Villafranca Ground Station. http://www.esa.int/esaMI/ESAC/SEM_8FXNZCIE_0.html. European Space Agency.
  5. Earth Remote Sensing Data Analysis Center (ERSDAC) (2010). Earth Observation Satellites. Seminar Room.
  6. Federici, B., Giacomelli, D., Sguerso, D., Vitti, A., Zatelli, P. (2010) A Web Processing Service for GNSS Realistic Planning. www.isprs.org/proceedings/xxxviii/4-W13/ID_10.pdf. Comm. IV/5
  7. Federici, B. and Sguerso, D., (2009). Planning GNSS realistico per applicazioni statiche e cinematiche. Bollettino SIFET session scientifica, ISSN: 1721-971X 1(1), pp. 79–93.
  8. Fruet, G., Sguerso, D. and Zatelli, P., (1999). Planning GPS au-tomatico con ostruzioni realistiche. In: Atti del convegno: a Conferenza nazionale delle Associazioni Scientifiche per le In- formazioni Territoriali ed Ambientali, Napoli.
  9. Gladstone, P. (2006). NAVSTAR GPS: Overview of GPS and Absolute Positioning. Chapter 8.
  10. Hauschild André (Undated). Near-Real-Time Orbit Determination of LEO Satellites DLR/GSOC, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany.
  11. Hauschild, A. and Montenbruck, O. (2008). Real-time Clock Estimation for Precise Orbit Determination of LEO Satellites, ION GNSS, Savannah, Georgia, USA,
  12. http:// www.developerfusion.com
  13. http://igs.org
  14. http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/
  15. http://www.nignet.net. Nigeria CORS Network. Provided by the Office of the Surveyor-General of the Federation (OSGoF), Federal Republic of Nigeria.
  16. http://nng.esoc.esa.de/gps/onboard_gps.html On-board GPS
  17. http://www.nrsa.gov.in. CartoSat-1: A Global IRS Mission for Large Scale Mapping and Terrain Modeling Applications. National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA) of India. Pp. 1-8.
  18. http://www.sstl.co.uk. NigeriaSat-2 Mission Objectives. Surrey Satellite Technology Limited. Accessed on 10/08/2011
  19. Langer, J., Powell, T., and Cox, J., (2002). Orbit Determination and Satellite Navigation. http://www.aero.org/publications/crosslink/summer2002/04.html
  20. Langer, J. V., Feess, W. A., Harrington, K. M., Bacigalupi, M. R. Mach, R. G., Abusali, P. A. M. and Cardoza, M. A., (1994).RADCAL: Precision Orbit Determination with a Commercial-Grade GPS Receiver. Proc. of the 1994 Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting ,San Diego, Jan).
  21. Langley, B. R., (1999). Dilution of Precision. GPS World, May 1999. www.gpsworld.com Pp. 52-59
  22. Misra, P., and Enge, P. (2001). Global Positioning System, Signals, Measurements, and Performance.
  23. Ojigi, M. L., (2012). Orbit Stability Analysis of NigeriaSat-1 Spacecraft Using Predicted Two Line Element Sets Data for 2004-2010. Nigerian Journal of Surveying & Geoinformatics. 4/1, March 2012. A Technical Publication of Nigerian Institution of Surveyors (NIS). ISSN: 0189-8914.. 39-54.
  24. Oppliger, G. (2007). Differential and precision GPS surveying for sub-meter and centimeter accuracy. Feb. crack.seismo.unr.edu/ftp/pub/louie/../GEOL493_Lec14_GPS_glo.ppt. (Accessed: 22-08-13)
  25. Sguerso, D. and Zatelli, P., (1999). Planning of kinematic GPS including realistic obstacles description. In: XXII General Assembly of IUGG, Birmingham, UK.
  26. Strang, G and Borre, K., (1997). Linear Algebra, Geodesy, and GPS, Wellesley-Cambridge Press, 1997.
  27. Tamunopekerebia, O., Chizea, F., Madalla, F., Lawal, A., Ezeoke, N., (2009). The NigeriaSat-X Project. A paper presented at the 2nd IAA Conference, Abuja, Nigeria. 10pp.
  28. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1996). NAVSTAR Global Positioning System Surveying, Department of the Army, Engineer Manual EM 1110-1-1003, Washington, DC 20314-1000
  29. Zatelli, P. and D'Inc`a, D., (2004). New modules for satellite surveying planning in GRASS. Geomatics Workbooks 3, pp. 1–14. ZOO Open WPS platform, 2010. http://www.zoo-project.org/ (accessed 18 May 2010).
How to Cite

Ojigi, M. L., Dodo, J. D., & Opaluwa, Y. D. (2014). GNSS Sky Visibility Planning and Dilution of Precision Analysis for EOS Ground Station Selection for Nigeria Space Programme. Journal of Geospatial Science and Technology, 1(1), 70-93. https://doi.org/10.54222/jgst.2014.ka46hcst

M. L. Ojigi, J. D. Dodo, and Y. D. Opaluwa, "GNSS Sky Visibility Planning and Dilution of Precision Analysis for EOS Ground Station Selection for Nigeria Space Programme," Journal of Geospatial Science and Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 70-93, October 2014. doi: 10.54222/jgst.2014.ka46hcst

Share this article:
Facebook X / Twitter LinkedIn
Download PDF View Full Text (PDF) Back to Articles